Submitted by mattress protector (not verified) on 10 September, 2009 - 18:18.
Some could argue that certain websites should be blocked (i.e. companies blocking sites to minimize employee distractions, prevent spread of hate speech). I have also heard of ISPs wanting to charge popular websites a fee to be accessible.
Protector of the public or villain?
Some could argue that certain websites should be blocked (i.e. companies blocking sites to minimize employee distractions, prevent spread of hate speech). I have also heard of ISPs wanting to charge popular websites a fee to be accessible.