United States: Is Filtering in Schools the Answer?


Is filtering in schools the answer? That's the question being asked across the United States. Although it is required by federal law to filter pornographic and other obscene content, many K-12 schools are choosing to also filter social networks, video sites like YouTube, sexual education sites, and other potentially valuable content, much to the chagrin of some educators.

A recent piece in Education Week focuses on school districts which have chosen a different route: educating students on digital citizenship. One school system profiled in the article, that of Trussville, Alabama, has taken that mantra a step further, maintaining Twitter and Facebook accounts and providing all of its 880 students with e-mail addresses. The school chooses not to filter sites like YouTube (at some educational levels) which - despite containing plenty of inane entertainment - contain a wealth of educational information.

As one teacher argues, "I’m a big advocate for experiential learning, but it’s kind of hard to teach Internet etiquette or rules of how to act and interact online without exposing them to the stuff that’s out there."


This is a tough subject. On the one had our children need to be able to experience what is in the world, however, it is the parent's right to decide when and where those exposures are to take place, not the teachers. casino en ligne

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Use [fn]...[/fn] (or <fn>...</fn>) to insert automatically numbered footnotes.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <sup> <h1> <h2> <h3>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question helps to reduce spam on the site. If you need new words, click the double-arrow icon on the form. If you need spoken word, click the speaker.